Arrangement should be considered useful to the eye, and tell the viewer the story. The useful arrangement results in an intellectual understanding that elevates the viewer to a greater understanding of ones self.

Boyle interpreted Utilitas, to be commodity.

If we examine utility with the idea of it being the product, a product of what? A man sitting on a bench? Well, that is just fatuous, silly and stupid. I dare even say that sort of subject may even attribute to some type of brain damage.

I dare say a product of the complete whole, movement arrangement and thought. The message might be just beauty as seen by the artist itself. A sort of Bel Compasto.